The new class names for Supercross are great. Or are they? Swizzle and I hash it out
The new class names for Supercross are great. Or are they? Swizzle and I hash it out
Matthes- I applaud the guys at Feld and the FIM and perhaps AMA for changing the class names from Supercross and Lites to 450SX and 250SX. Any listener to my podcasts or Pulpmx Show knows my feelings on the old names. They were simply ridiculous and in talking to a high-ranking official a couple of weeks ago, Iâd like to apologize for the old names taking so long to get changed. You see according to this official my constant railing on the current class names on Twitter and on these shows made it impossible for the powers that be to change the names so as to not look like they were catering to me.
Now Iâm not sure if thatâs true or not but whatever the case is, happy days are here again. 450SX and 250SX make SO much more sense, itâs not even funny. You couldnât stick with the old 250 and 125 names for obvious reasons but Iâm pretty sure the only thing that would have made it worse would have been to name the classes after THE ACTUAL NAME OF THE SPORT. This would be like saying the L.A Dodgers play in the baseball division of baseball. Huh?
Exactly.
So as much as Swizzle is going to go on and on about how they missed the mark, they didnât- they got it right and is it perfect? No but itâs pretty damm close.
Swizzle- Are you flipping kidding me?! This is like shooting fish in a barrel, or taking candy from a baby. I honestly feel like Johnny Knoxville in The Ringer right now. You canât honestly and seriously think you have a shot in hell at making a more valid point than me in this argument!
You even make my own point for me in your defense when you say âyou couldnât stick with 250 and 125 for obvious reasonsâ. REALLY!? The logic behind the reason for choosing the names is as flawed, maybe not as reprehensibly idiotic, but just as flawed as the previous âSupercrossâ and âSupercross Litesâ monicors.
Yeah yeah yeah, I hear you devils-advocates(as you like to call yourselves), âhow many times have the displacements changed over the yearsâ? You know what smart-guy, thatâs not the effing point. The point in formulating a solution for any problem; conceived, proposed, or realized; is that it is fool proof and stands the test of time. Itâs got to be future-proof or itâs horseshit.
This is so maddening to me because of how EASY it would be to get it right. Itâs what I have been railing about in Swizcorner for two years now. SX1 and SX2. No displacement indication and couldnât be simpler for everyone. Fans, and leisure-fans alike. It is indeed, FUTURE-PROOF and dead simple.
Itâs mind-boggling to me that as smart as the guys are who run the show at Feld, this âband-aidâ of a solution was okâd by them when there was at minimum, one glaringly obvious cure to this epidemic failure of a solution.
Iâm not the slightest bit confused why you think this is ok for a solution. Youâre a âgood enoughâ guy, I am a push the concept until it canât be questioned person who wonât relent until Iâm convinced the solution is concrete. This solution is play-doh
Swizcore, OUT.
Matthes: Please Swizzle, please for the love of god donât use Stillwellâs âsignatureâ catch-phrase. Itâs beneath you. I can see now that youâre the type of guy that would win 10 million in a lottery and complain that it wasnât 100 million. Geez, for one itâs 1000% better than what it was (your assertion that itâs âas flawedâ as the Supercross and Lites class names is unbelievable. Like, I want a drug test done on you ASAP) and it also lines up nicely with what MX Sports has done in the outdoors. As in, thereâs symmetry (something I know you love) between the series. Had you gone to SX1 and SX2 weâd be back to explain what the differences is between indoors and outdoor racing. Itâs not a band-aid, itâs a solution. With the economy the way it is, do you see the displacement sizes changing anytime soon? Breaking news Swizzle- the 350 thing doesn’t work. Weâre good on the displacement thing.
Again, donât look a gift horse in the mouth. Weâre good now- letâs just worry about these PulpMX people who are going to assassinate us because of your precious Apple IOS bug.
Swizzle- You shut your mouth when you talk to me about the very bane of my existance that is, the iOS bug from Hell. Iâm glad you picked up on my Stillwell reference. The love child of Ryno and Jlaw. Anyway, no, if I won a $10 mil lottery, I wouldnât complain it wasnât $100 mil⌠but I would complain about the government taxing the crap out of it. Iâm reasonable, that which you are not. You are taking this lying down, right up the tail pipe and I refuse to accept it.
Regarding the 350 not working, of course it doesnât work when you line it up against 100cc larger motors. What moron could honestly believe thereâs no disadvantage there? Itâs not a theory, itâs math mixed with physics. Proven.
How did we end up in this land of milk, four-strokes and honey? Oh thatâs right, Yamaha built a purpose-crafted thumper to take advantage of yet another failure of a sanctioning rule. Donât think for a second that the prospect of 450ccâs changing is a pipe-dream.
In the end, this classification name will prove a failure to all as it already is to me. I wonât say I told you so. Iâll be too busy building the worlds biggest soap-box ever and renting a scissor lift to get on top of it.
Rollerball agrees with me.
Matthes: Donât you ever bring Rollerball into this. You just wrote a 226 word comeback to me where you addressed why a 350 doesnât work and why we are now in a four-stroke world thanks to AMAâs short sightedness and Yamahaâs ingenuity but only 46 on why the class name change makes you so mad. Just relax, be happy and understand that this is a great change for the sport and one thatâs long overdue.
Long live 450SX and 250SX!!